AriovisAccuKnoxTechnology partner — AI agent protection

Ariovis × AccuKnox — Agentic security

Secure the agent before an autonomous action becomes an incident.

AI agents read files, query data, select tools, use MCP, call APIs and execute actions. Moving from content generation to autonomous action creates a new security surface.

Ariovis relies on AccuKnox to extend identity architectures to the code, tools, workloads and runtime behaviour of the agent.

Why this layer was missing

IAM governs identities and access. But an autonomous agent adds other surfaces: code, dependencies, model, dataset, prompt, RAG, memory, tools, MCP servers, APIs, processes, files, network and workload.

AccuKnox extends that chain to execution: see what makes up the agent, understand what it actually does and act before, during and after it runs.

  • Code and supply chain
  • Models and datasets
  • Prompts, RAG and memory
  • Tools, MCP and APIs
  • Workloads and runtime
  • Detection and containment

From build to runtime

Four stages structure the protection. Exact capabilities and deployment modes are confirmed during technical scoping.

  1. 01

    Discover

    Inventory and prioritise the AI surface actually in place.

    • AI-SPM
    • AI assets and Shadow AI
    • Models, agents, datasets and pipelines
    • Exposure and dependencies
  2. 02

    Test before production

    Test the build and behaviour before an agent can act.

    • AI Red Teaming
    • Prompt injection and jailbreak
    • Models and datasets
    • Supply chain and build controls
  3. 03

    Protect execution

    Control language, agentic interfaces and the workload.

    • Prompt / Response Firewall
    • Tools, MCP and agentic APIs
    • Capability restrictions
    • Runtime sandbox, processes, files and network
    • Technical identity and workload attestation
  4. 04

    Detect and respond

    Connect technical signals into an actionable timeline.

    • AI-DR
    • Abnormal behaviour and exfiltration
    • Containment
    • SOC, SIEM and ticketing
    • Timeline and evidence

Technical identity, attestation and governance capabilities are qualified during scoping: they do not replace IGA or the identity lifecycle governance owned by IAM.

AccuKnox and Axiomatics do not make the same decision

The two layers can meet at runtime without being interchangeable.

Axiomatics — Decide

Should this action be authorized?

  • Business policy
  • Identity, resource and action
  • Context and purpose
  • ABAC / PBAC
  • Externalized decision

AccuKnox — Protect execution

What is the agent actually doing, and how can dangerous behaviour be stopped?

  • Agent, tool and MCP
  • Prompt, model and data
  • Workload and process
  • Files and network
  • Detection and containment
An Axiomatics policy can decide whether a business action is allowed or denied. AccuKnox provides the visibility and controls needed to secure the environment in which that action is prepared and executed, then detect or contain abnormal behaviour.

How Ariovis contributes

Ariovis does more than deploy a platform: we select, integrate and operate the controls that matter inside your architecture.

  • Use-case scoping
  • Threat modelling
  • AccuKnox architecture and integration
  • Control configuration
  • Connection with IAM, PAM, Access Management and authorization
  • Testing and go-live
  • SOC, SIEM and ticketing connection
  • Procedures and runbooks
  • Knowledge transfer
  • Operations and continuous improvement

Start with one agent, its tools and its real effects.

A first scope maps the surface, tests risk scenarios and identifies the protections that are actually needed.