Every organization has its own context, priorities and operational constraints.
These case studies illustrate different Identity and Access Management challenges, from strategy and governance to access management, privileged access and architecture.
All examples presented on this website come from real Ariovis engagements.
Some organizations need an objective assessment before deciding on their target architecture. Our case studies show that a framing engagement can lead to keeping the existing environment, defining new scenarios or giving up the acquisition of an additional platform.
An IAM transformation can focus on the access model, the extension to new contexts, program governance or operating conditions. These evolutions can deliver value without immediately engaging a technological replacement.
Replacing a platform becomes an option when requirements, architecture constraints and the economics of the environment make another path more relevant. Our case studies also include rationalization projects with the decommissioning of existing components.
The Department of Mayenne wanted greater sovereignty, control and autonomy over its identity management system.
An industrial organization wanted to select an IAM solution suited to a global, heterogeneous and highly customized information system.
A retail organization needed to restore a unified view, clear governance and stronger delivery momentum across its IAM program.
A software publisher needed to regain control of an IAM platform, restore delivery momentum and build lasting internal autonomy.
A construction-sector organization wanted a clearer view of its actual PAM coverage and a prioritized path for future improvements.
A transportation organization needed to rebuild the foundations of its PAM program, clarify its model and industrialize application onboarding.
A non-profit organization wanted to rationalize a heterogeneous IAM landscape, simplify operations and build a coherent identity foundation.
A software publisher needed to structure its access model and govern the choices made by the integrator deploying its Identity Governance platform.
A banking organization wanted to assess an initial identity architecture designed for a partner use case and define sustainable evolution scenarios.
A banking organization wanted to structure its approach to identity federation, related standards and the implementation of Single Sign-On.
An energy organization wanted to centralize IAM initiatives, harmonize processes and establish a dedicated architecture function.
A defense organization needed to extend its Identity Governance environment to a new national context with specific organizational and compliance constraints.
A French banking organization set out to industrialize identity lifecycle management and strengthen access reviews through the deployment of an IGA platform.
Identity and Access Management projects never begin in exactly the same way.
Some organizations need strategic guidance before selecting technologies.
Others focus on identity governance, privileged access, authentication or the evolution of an existing architecture.
These case studies illustrate that diversity while preserving the confidentiality of the organizations involved.
For Netwrix Identity Manager projects, explore our expertise as a Netwrix partner and integrator.
The first conversation helps us understand your priorities, constraints and transformation objectives before discussing technology choices.
