Identity security

Secure Active Directory and reduce attack paths

Understand how one identity, one delegation or one misconfiguration can lead all the way to your most sensitive resources.

A list of vulnerabilities does not tell you what is actually reachable. An attack path does: it links an ordinary identity to a critical asset, and it is fixed by order of effect.

Does this sound familiar?

  • Groups and delegations have piled up over the years.
  • Privileged accounts are numerous or poorly segmented.
  • Dormant and orphaned accounts remain.
  • Sensitive changes go unmonitored.
  • Teams know the vulnerabilities, but not the exploitation paths.
  • Remediation is not prioritised by real effect.

What you are trying to achieve

  • Visualise the attack paths.
  • Identify accounts and groups at risk.
  • Remove dangerous delegations.
  • Fix the configurations that matter first.
  • Monitor changes.
  • Detect abnormal interaction with sensitive assets.

The Ariovis capabilities involved

Each offer keeps its own role. Here is exactly what it brings to this situation.

  • Identity and Active Directory security

    Analyse accounts, delegations and sensitive groups, then build a prioritised remediation path.

  • Privileged access and secrets

    Remove the standing privileges that feed the shortest attack paths.

  • Trapster — Deceptive Security

    Place decoys along the identified paths to detect progression as early as possible.

  • Identity and access penetration testing

    Confront the analysis with real exploitation and verify what is genuinely reachable.

  • IAM operations

    Monitor sensitive changes and hold the level reached after remediation.

Understanding the main Active Directory attack techniques

An Active Directory attack path rarely relies on a single misconfiguration. An attacker combines identities, rights, protocols, service accounts and trust relationships to move towards a more sensitive resource. Knowing the techniques involved helps identify the paths that are genuinely exploitable, and above all where to break them.

  • Legacy protocols

    NTLM Relay

    Relay a legacy authentication to another service in order to act with the rights of an identity you do not control.

  • Lateral movement

    Pass-the-Hash

    Reuse a password hash collected on a workstation to authenticate elsewhere, without ever knowing the password.

  • Lateral movement

    Pass-the-Ticket

    Reuse a valid Kerberos ticket to extend access or move towards a more sensitive resource.

  • Delegations

    Kerberos delegation

    Divert a poorly scoped delegation to impersonate another user, sometimes up to an administrative identity.

A technique is not an attack path

Kerberoasting, DCSync or Pass-the-Hash are not, on their own, a complete attack. They are steps an attacker chains together when the environment allows it.

The risk comes from the chain, not from the isolated technique.

  1. Compromised identity
  2. Discovery of what is reachable
  3. Secret obtained or abused
  4. Privilege escalation
  5. Lateral movement
  6. Access to a critical identity or resource
Detecting each technique separately is not enough. What matters are the relationships between identities, privileges and resources that let an attacker chain several steps up to a critical asset.

Spotting a technique is not enough: the path has to be broken

Remediation is not about adding another tool. It is about removing the conditions that make the chain possible, starting with the fixes that eliminate the largest number of paths.

  • Remove unnecessary privileges and standing rights.
  • Review service accounts, their SPNs and their secrets.
  • Fix delegations that are too broad or purely historical.
  • Remove misconfigurations and legacy mechanisms.
  • Protect privileged identities and administration paths.
  • Harden Active Directory and its PKI.
  • Monitor sensitive changes and behaviours.
  • Strengthen identity and entitlement governance.

Where to start

Map critical assets, privileged identities, delegations and the main paths leading to them.

  1. 01Define what really matters: domain controllers, critical applications and data.
  2. 02Analyse the groups, delegations and ACLs granting access to them.
  3. 03Reconstruct the shortest paths from an ordinary identity.
  4. 04Prioritise remediation by the number of paths it removes.

Related use cases

To keep reading on situations that touch the same surface: technical identities, standing privileges, APIs and application access.

  • Access and privileges

    Reduce standing privileges

    Replace permanent administrative rights with proportionate, temporary and traceable access.

  • Access and privileges

    Govern service accounts and secrets

    Take back control of legacy technical identities: their owners, their secrets and their privileges.

  • Identity security

    Prevent data breaches

    Stop a legitimate or compromised identity from reaching too much data, for too long, without anyone noticing.

A Practical Starting Point

A short format, already online, to get an objective view of your situation before committing to a project.

  • Active Directory Security

    Gives a maturity score and prioritised risks to start the first remediations.

    Active Directory Security

See It in Practice

Real engagements whose approach sheds light on this situation.

  • Sector : Non-profit

    Rationalizing an IAM landscape around Microsoft

    A non-profit organization wanted to rationalize a heterogeneous IAM landscape, simplify operations and build a coherent identity foundation.

    Illustrates a comparable approach to putting a Microsoft identity foundation back in order.

Explore the Topic

Our published content that speaks directly to this situation.

Understand the Concepts

The notions worth sharing with your teams on this topic.

Does this use case look like yours?

Tell us about your context. Together we identify the priority capabilities and the first useful step.