Staff augmentation
- Skills made available
- Steering owned by client
- Effort-based commitment
- Useful during projects or ad-hoc reinforcement
Identity and access are a pillar of your security posture. Running them requires a stable, available, trained team, engaged on outcomes — not only on hours.
The Ariovis managed service (MSSP IAM) goes beyond IAM operations: Ariovis takes operational responsibility for all or part of your IAM, IGA, Access Management, CIAM and PAM platforms, with formal service commitments and dedicated governance.
Understanding the difference between staff augmentation, IAM operations and a managed service helps pick the right model for the right maturity step.
These three models are complementary and often succeed one another. Managed IAM services are contracted with clear scope, commitments and reversibility.
Ariovis operates the platform, owns service commitments, operational security, monitoring, patching, recurring evolutions and continuous improvement. The client retains strategy, compliance and structuring decisions.
Ariovis operates a defined scope — for instance the IGA layer, Access, PAM, CIAM or the monitoring tier. The rest of the setup remains driven by the client’s internal teams.
Exact scope, included components, shared responsibilities and thresholds are formalised in a service assurance plan. These models are illustrative.
A managed IAM service is not just ‘keeping the service running’. It combines operations, operational security, governance and continuous improvement.
In MSSP mode, commitments cover incidents but also availability, restoration and eradication. The matrix below illustrates values already proposed.
Depending on the contract, Ariovis can commit to acknowledgement (response), restoration (restoration time) and an eradication path. Values are contracted per criticality and scope.
| Priority | GTI | GTR | Eradication | Post-mortem |
|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 Critical incident | 2 hours | 8 hours | 10 business days | 3 business days after restoration |
P2 Major incident | 4 hours | 24 hours | 20 business days | On request |
The Ariovis support platform remains accessible 24/7 to raise and follow requests, independently from staffed coverage.
Ariovis has already proposed a 9 a.m.–6 p.m. dedicated team model. Different coverage can be defined contractually.
On-call, smarthands, 24/7 monitoring and crisis cells are contracted based on criticality, geography and stakes.
In managed services, the responsibility chain must be even clearer than in operations alone: the client must know who decides, who executes and who reports, at each step.
Ariovis’ operational responsibility in MSSP IAM does not replace vendor, hosting or client-retained responsibilities, which are explicitly defined in the contract.
A managed IAM service without real monitoring is not one. Ariovis sets up functional and technical monitoring tailored to IAM components.
The grid is calibrated per platform and per contract. No historical performance data is presented here.
MSSP IAM commits Ariovis to reduce incident surface and improve the platform, not only to answer tickets.
A serious managed service has its own governance, distinct from project steering. Depending on the contract, Ariovis mobilises several committees and roles.
Committee frequency is tuned to service criticality and contractual scope. Cadence above is illustrative.
A serious managed service is judged as much on how it starts as on how it can end. Entry transition and reversibility are contracted, not left informal.
Ariovis remains vendor-agnostic. Managed services can operate an existing environment without changing tools. No third-party logo is listed as an official partner without contractual validation.
Examples of managed IAM engagements representative of our practice.
Long-term operation of an IGA platform including support, maintenance and evolutions, with dedicated governance.
Takeover of a service under pressure: hypercare, stabilisation, then transition to managed services with formal commitments.
Managed service combining Access Management, legacy component decommissioning and identity ecosystem steering.
Continuous handling of a PAM programme: application onboarding, access review, continuous improvement, vendor escalation.
Anonymized references. No client is named without written authorization.
Ariovis MSSP IAM relies on four locations with complementary roles. Day-to-day managed service delivery is particularly carried by the Brussels team.
Service management, governance and client relationship.
Consulting, technical expertise and complex escalations.
Technical and consulting expertise, evolutions.
Team particularly focused on managed services and operations for Benelux, Switzerland and Germany.
A single contract can mobilise several sites — for instance Paris for governance, Bordeaux for expertise and Brussels for managed operations.
IAM managed services extend our integrator craft and our IAM operations offering: once the platform is ready, Ariovis can carry operational responsibility. See our integrator approach, our IAM operations offering and our locations map for a complete view.
An MSSP IAM is a provider that takes contractual, operational responsibility for all or part of an identity and access platform. It runs the platform, secures it day to day, and reports to the client against service commitments.
Staff augmentation provides skills steered by the client with an effort-based commitment. A managed service commits the provider to outcomes, a scope, SLAs and dedicated governance.
IAM operations cover support, maintenance and continuous improvement with incident SLAs. Managed services go further: Ariovis owns operational responsibility, including operational security, platform lifecycle and dedicated governance.
Yes. Ariovis can operate a defined scope — IGA, Access, PAM, CIAM, or monitoring only. The rest remains driven by the client.
Commitments are formalised in a service assurance plan defining scope, hours, SLAs, responsibilities, processes, governance and reversibility.
The Ariovis portal is available 24/7. Staffed coverage (9 a.m.–6 p.m., extended, on-call, 24/7 monitoring) is a contractual variable, calibrated to the accepted risk level.
Ariovis tracks vendor vulnerabilities, applies critical patches, reviews technical access and coordinates with the client’s security team. Security incidents follow a dedicated process.
Yes. Reversibility is structural: operations documentation, procedures, skills transfer at end of contract, access reset. It is described from contract signing.
Yes. Managed services include continuous improvement and can carry recurring evolutions (new connectors, new use cases, application onboarding). Structural evolutions can be handled as projects.
Yes. It is a common path: Ariovis takes over support, stabilises the service, then, if the client wishes, the relationship evolves toward a managed service with broader commitments.
Yes, within the agreed scope. Monitoring covers availability, jobs, connectors, data quality and security indicators. Alerts can automatically feed the support portal.
It follows a major-incident procedure: immediate mobilisation, crisis cell, workaround, restoration, client communication, then post-mortem within 3 business days maximum, with an eradication action.
In managed services, Ariovis drives vendor escalation: ticket opening, evidence submission, follow-up until fix, consolidated client communication.
Yes. We operate Netwrix Identity Manager, Ping Identity, Entra ID, Keycloak, Axiomatics, Netwrix Privilege Secure, Keeper and existing CyberArk environments, among others. Managed services can operate an existing environment without changing tools.
The Ariovis Brussels team is particularly focused on managed services and operations, in close coordination with Paris, Châtillon (Hauts-de-Seine) and Bordeaux (Nouvelle-Aquitaine). A single contract can mobilise several sites.
Ariovis operates mainly in France and across Benelux, Switzerland and Germany, with a dedicated Brussels team for the zone.
A first, no-commitment conversation helps qualify your context, platform criticality and the most suitable managed model (partial or full).