Identity governance
Model the populations, roles, access requests and reviews that make automation sustainable.
Identities and lifecycle
Automate the identity lifecycle
Create, change and remove access at the right moment, from reliable sources and rules people can understand.
Joiners, movers and leavers are rarely decided inside the IAM platform: they are decided in the sources, the processes and the responsibilities. That is where useful automation starts.
Does this sound familiar?
- Onboarding still relies on spreadsheets, emails or manual tickets.
- New joiners start without all the access they need.
- Internal moves pile up rights people no longer use.
- Departures do not trigger every revocation straight away.
- HR sources and directories contradict each other.
- Every application has invented its own process.
What you are trying to achieve
- Make reference data trustworthy.
- Automate joiner, mover and leaver processes.
- Cut errors and delays.
- Grant access through rules you actually control.
- Keep exceptions and approvals visible.
- Produce evidence that stands up to review.
The Ariovis capabilities involved
Each offer keeps its own role. Here is exactly what it brings to this situation.
IAM integration
Build the connectors, data migration and workflows all the way to go-live.
IAM strategy and Zero Trust
Choose the systems of record, the application priorities and the rollout sequence.
IAM operations
Keep the flows alive, handle discrepancies and evolve the rules after go-live.
Where to start
Map the populations, lifecycle events, systems of record and the first priority applications.
- 01List the populations really in scope: employees, externals, contractors, shared accounts.
- 02Describe lifecycle events and what triggers them today.
- 03Identify the system of record for each structuring attribute.
- 04Pick two or three representative pilot applications.
See It in Practice
Real engagements whose approach sheds light on this situation.
Sector : Software Publisher
Structuring an Identity Governance deployment
A software publisher needed to structure its access model and govern the choices made by the integrator deploying its Identity Governance platform.
Illustrates a comparable approach: structuring an IGA deployment before automating at scale.
Read the case study : Structuring an Identity Governance deployment
Sector : Defense
Deploying Identity Governance in a sensitive environment
A defense organization needed to extend its Identity Governance environment to a new national context with specific organizational and compliance constraints.
Shows how to make a lifecycle reliable in a highly constrained environment.
Read the case study : Deploying Identity Governance in a sensitive environment
Sector : Banking
Industrializing identity governance in a complex banking environment
A French banking organization set out to industrialize identity lifecycle management and strengthen access reviews through the deployment of an IGA platform.
Offers useful feedback on industrialising governance across a complex application landscape.
Read the case study : Industrializing identity governance in a complex banking environment
Explore the Topic
Our published content that speaks directly to this situation.
Field note
An identity is almost never described by a single source
Explains why an identity is rarely described by a single source, and what that changes for automation.
Field note
What if we stopped manufacturing roles?
Helps explore how roles are built before freezing assignment rules.
Understand the Concepts
The notions worth sharing with your teams on this topic.
Does this use case look like yours?
Tell us about your context. Together we identify the priority capabilities and the first useful step.